In addition to getting you off track, it's important to get an understanding of what your audience expects of you, your show, and what they believe. Here are some helpful videos with specific examples of what they expect of you.
You are entitled to your own opinion about how your show should be viewed.
People of color do well in the audience, and most people agree that the show should be heard so that their voices can be heard.
But when it comes to a show that includes people of color, they are not entitled to their own viewpoints. You are not free to write a piece about how you should feel about discrimination based on race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or ability.
If your show includes people of color and you are not on the same page, your audience may be less likely to want your opinions, or it may be that you have made some negative remarks (although people of color are more prone to such negativity). So, how should you talk out your remarks about race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or
Write a polemic in a newspaper that has an opinion from a white liberal, or read a blog dedicated to other left-wing issues like the Vietnam War. These are all great ways to spread the gospel. But there is this: the "left's hatred of black people" is just what the left is doing because a white liberal can see that if you talk too much to them, then they will eventually come across they "hate me too much to like me."
In the end, the left is making us all feel bad. It isn't good at anything (unless they have been doing that for years) because everything that's good about their position on issues can be worse than what is good about theirs. If you've ever wanted to hear what the Left's enemies are like, you're in luck. They can come around on the left as an effective strategy to get you to go with them on all the issues they've got running and they will. A quick Google of "left-wing hatred" tells you that the only thing left is hatred of the liberals. And because the left knows that any political action that starts to alienate white supporters is a failure in the eyes of those white liberals, it'll have a small chance of winning.
Of course, even if you are a white liberal, the left is not going to be happy with you because they know you can become a more conservative person. So why should that be so?
Write a polemic
Rigby Caulfield, a historian of history at Harvard University, argues some conservative ideas are based on "fake" quotes. He writes in his book "The New Jim Crow: Race and the War on the Black Land" that the right-wing backlash over the death penalty and Jim Crow law led to "a generation of racists who didn't like the blacks."
"The most violent, the deadliest, or most violent," Caulfield writes in his book, "were the people who had never seen a lynch mob."
Caulfield contends that the "murder that you hear about often has a basis in fact."
"Most of these people were a racial minority that could not understand the racism that the system had to offer, just as most could never understand the slavery that existed in the white North South, and they didn't have a choice in the matter."
Caulfield's book is about many aspects of the American Civil Rights Movement and his most recent book, "Race, Culture and Politics," examines what he calls "white supremacy," including the efforts of white nationalists to keep blacks out.
He also describes the "hate-filled "political movements" that led to civil rights and anti-war efforts in both the South and North at the turn of the century.
"We've only really begun to grasp what people said about those political movements," he writes. "Their movements have
Write a polemic with your hands on it, but before you can do it, we'll put one of our own.
There is this old saying that "the less you hate, the worse." I believe that the more you hate your own boss, the less he'll give you work you like and work you like. It's just that our boss is so hard working that he won't just do anything you don't like.
If you like him, he'll give you any work he does, as long as you don't hate him. If you don't like him, he'll give you free work or free rides. That doesn't mean that we hate you, I'm proud of you.
But we are all sinners—and what are they?
It's hard to answer all the questions. We'll have one. You'll get to give that one work, you'll get to do it when you like it. And we've never told you so. But we're getting there.
You can give that, but that's the way it goes when it comes to the work we love. And that's why I believe you can do anything if you really want.
—Hank Regan
What Does the Christian God Want Out Of You?
The Christian God wants you to hate him with an outstretched hand. That's what makes his power more interesting.
But then, this is the person
Write a polemic on that topic here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPillarPodcast/comments/4x6t7r/this_has_been_more_lady_in_lady_bunny/ The Red Pill has a lot of things to do with our society today, it's not clear if it's worth considering it; i.e. not being able to afford a second home…well, at least in New Zealand.
Now I'm not going to argue that being homeless was bad. It might as well have been: this is what you have to do if you want a life on public assistance – if you want to live as an adult you have to. However, I do want to emphasize those that are homeless or have had to be treated as such because their homelessness began back in the day because the homeless were there so that their families could. If you think that living in a society where it is illegal to get into an apartment without a landlord is morally wrong, you must make your decision. It is hard to explain and often, most likely, hard to convince a person that their situation is right. But there is one thing that works best for them: You have been living in a society that was originally based on morality, which is the one common ground. Not having some type of legal status which allows you to get into the apartment without a landlord will make it right for most of us
Write a polemic against Trump on Friday, which would include criticizing the Republican presidential nominee's claim that Muslims in "every other religion" would go to work during WWII.
"If the Jews were alive, the only way they would become Jewish was if an evil god came in and gave them the best chance of surviving," Bannon wrote in an op-ed in the Washington Post. "We would all be at war and we are now heading for the war with Hitler, if not the next Hitler."
According to the Wall Street Journal, the Times op-ed has been met with mixed reactions from Jewish supporters — which include some who have long embraced any suggestion the article will incite mass violence.
"The NYT 'Op-ed' Is A 'Jewish Conspiracy' Of A New Front For Chaos," wrote one person on Twitter and another a commenter. "I'm gonna boycott @nytimes, boycott all other publications."
Write a polemic against me: https://t.co/Yz8Sj9vV8D5
The Post has a lot of stories on how feminism can't be a 'good thing'
The Left should embrace and embrace the work of those women activists who say that #BlackLivesMatter not only hurts women, it's actually hurting their whole culture.
Write a polemic about something you do not trust, or even the moral principles we hold dear. Let the person who has done something wrong and is doing it wrong be corrected - this is your right to do so. You may choose to disagree with all of it - but one is never morally wrong if you try to disagree with it - or that you can prove your point by presenting an argument. If you wish to correct a wrong, it is a matter of fact that a more accurate definition of "wrong" would probably be for most people. In any case, you should know what the wrong means, and what are the consequences of taking action. The wrong we want to correct must not be the same as the good that we want to uphold... that is, that we need not apply the definition of "wrong" to everything. The difference between "wrong" and "good" is, of course, trivial - there is no reason not to do something that is good - but sometimes we want something that is bad, as in "it is the enemy of my god". This is no different from an attack on the ground. You also have the right to respond to such an attack, and should. The second part of your defense is: - you've been so much an asshole before, or worse - you're not going to feel any remorse now. But the question becomes if this is your right: will it be accepted by all, or will it be destroyed by our response?
Write a polemic here or here. Let's not forget our biggest and most common mistake is to overlook one aspect of our culture. Whether it's racism, misogyny, and sexism in its core, or even all of those things, this is about more than just our culture.
People of color are more likely to say that they're "white" and "black," or "black/white" than are those who don't speak up, or refuse to participate…and many whites may say those results don't apply to them.
It takes a lot of talent to identify what actually matters in a given social context, and that is why black and Latino kids' parents are more than the focus of a story about a "bad" dad. The truth is though, that black and brown kids still want to see a black dad with black skin than a white kid.
The reason why white children are more likely to say "we didn't do it" is because they're learning that black and brown kids think black people aren't smart, that they're ignorant, and that they don't have the same power as that.
I didn't say they didn't have it! They did! (I'd be remiss)
This is why so many black and brown kids do not want to grow up believing that they can just pretend otherwise, that they're not worthy of a black parent, that they're not smart enough in school, and so on
Write a polemic to the media on Monday afternoon at 4 p.m. as he called former New Mexico Gov. George W. Bush in the White House, who was in a car with some 20 journalists, "a lunatic."
This was just a few days after former U.N. security ambassador Susan Rice tweeted that Obama's "fierce commitment to combatting terror" was based on having "no plans to re-sign" a treaty he negotiated with Iran on "counterinsurgency," not just in Syria.
Here's how Fox News Channel would cover any "fear" Obama is being accused of having "no plans to re-sign" any controversial nuclear agreement with Iran.
Fox News Channel could call for "a nuclear deal with Iran before the beginning of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan" in honor of Friday's attacks in Paris. https://t.co/4cZsTQ7kEj — The Five (@thefive) November 2, 2015
Fox News could invite its members to join a "war on terror," so as not to offend the Islamic faith. https://t.co/1Z9Yl8Dq8J — The Five (@thefive) November 2, 2015
When former Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) tweeted in October that Trump was "waving a hand and calling me a communist" last June, Fox News was just fine with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment